The Mindful Judge®

The Art of Non-Judgmental Awareness in Action

 
 

Mindfulness and the Judge


There is perhaps no finer context in which to explore the role of mindfulness in everyday life, than that of the judicial decision-making process. At the heart of mindfulness practice is non-judgmental awareness.  At the heart of judicial decision-making is judgment.


The key to reconciling this interesting and seeming paradox is that the non-judgmental component to mindful awareness is one that cannot be realized through intellectual consideration. 


Shakespeare offers us:


Forbear to judge, for we are sinner all.

Close his eyes and draw the curtains close;

And let us all to meditation.


                                King Henry VI


The capacity to make decisions drawing upon what is perhaps the highest form of judgment -- wisdom and compassion -- is founded on an elusive state of mind. So easy it is to shift -- often without awareness -- to a “judgment” shrouded in bias, preconception, agenda, politics, and, to be perfectly (Jerome) frank, even the contents of one’s breakfast menu.


Great judges, whether their accomplishments are honed through the intentional incorporation of a contemplative practice into their personal or professional lives, or by way of the natural embodiment of the traits associated with mindfulness -- or both -- possess the qualities of wisdom, compassion, and courage.  Together, we can term this state of mind and body, “presence.” 


These qualities of presence find expression in the traits of deep listening, both to the parties before the court and the activities of the mind (i.e., the “neural circuit court”), reflection, the regulation of emotion, empathy, compassion, and other traits that allow for the people, issues, and concerns arising in the moment to be seen clearly and not become their own source of reactivity.  A judge who is in the flow of this mindful embrace, has a presence -- whether on the bench or in a panel deliberation -- that inspires and transforms.


Many judges have experienced this phenomena -- whether by being in the presence of another or offering it themselves.  And also, most judges have experienced the challenge of being caught amid reactivity and bias. The cultivation of mindfulness asks only that awareness be applied to these experiences for it is through this awareness that the shift toward greater wisdom and compassion inevitably moves.


Judges play an interesting role in society.  They are often the product of political forces, are endowed with extraordinary power, and may be accountable to no one but their own conscience. A confluence of competing and, at time, seemingly irreconcilable factors, converge to set in motion the rich landscape of a judge’s life and life’s work. 


Yet judges remain, above all else, human beings -- cultivating the heart and mind of a Solomon or a Deborah as they practice their noble work.


We’d be delighted to hear from you with your thoughts on the challenging and exciting role mindfulness plays in the work of the judge.  Click here to send us an e-mail.


Click here to learn more about the Institute for Mindfulness Studies.



 

The Mindful Docket

Solomon Wisdom

“Splitting the Baby, Attachment and Satisfying a Judgment”


In the law, an attachment is a remedy that satisfies a judgment.  In the context of contemplative practices, the Jurisight term “attachment” is explored as a thought that arises to satisfy a judgment. In the days of King Solomon, “That’s my baby,” was one such thought. . . .  Click here read more.